ACLU of Kentucky

donate.png

 

 

action-alert.png

 

 

OOPS. Your Flash player is missing or outdated.Click here to update your player so you can see this content.
News (By Date)
Conforme se aproxima el fin de semana feriado, la ACLU del estadode Kentucky difunde alerta a resid
Thursday, July 8, 2010, 12:46 pm

  PARA SU DIFUSIÓN INMEDIATA

June 30, 2010

CONTACTO: Kate Miller, Prgram Associate, 502-581-9746, This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

 

(Kentucky) – En respuesta alas amenazas contra las libertades civiles provocadas por la recientepromulgación de la ley de discriminación racial de Arizona, la Unión Americanade Libertades Civiles (ACLU) de Kentucky, emitió una alerta a viajeros el díade hoy para informar a los residentes del estado de Kentucky de sus derechos encaso de que los intercepten las autoridades al viajar dentro del estado deArizona. Dicha ley anticonstitucional, conocida como la SB 1070, requiere quelos miembros de los cuerpos policiacos exijan “documentos” a las personas aquienes intercepten si sospechan que no tienen autorización para estar en losEstados Unidos. Si dichos individuos no pueden comprobar a los oficiales quetienen permiso para estar en los EE.UU., pueden ser objeto del arresto sinorden judicial y sin causa probable de que hayan cometido un delito.

 

 

Aunque la ley no entrará en vigorhasta el 29 de julio, a la ACLU del estado de Kentucky le preocupa que algunosmiembros de las fuerzas del orden público ya han comenzado a aplicar algunasdisposiciones de la ley. Incluso, Arizona tiene ya antecedentes dediscriminación racial generalizada por parte de las autoridades, especialmenteen el Condado de Maricopa. Además, existe una política anti-inmigrante defacto de “desgaste por medio delcumplimiento” por parte de los legisladores de Arizona, cuya intención es crearun ambiente lo suficientemente hostil hacia los latinos y demás personas “decolor”, que acaban por abandonar el estado por su propia voluntad.

 

“Es imperativo que los residentesdel estado de Kentucky tengan claro sus derechos antes de viajar a Arizona,”dijo Michael Alridge, Director Ejecutivo de la ACLU del estado de Kentucky.  “Los residentes de Kentucky deben estarconscientes que según esta ley, cualquier persona que tenga aspecto de‘extranjero’ tiene una mayor probabilidad de que lo intercepten porinfracciones menores, como tener las direccionales rotas o cruzar la calle ilegalmente,y que luego les pidan sus ‘documentos’ si la policía cree, con tan sólomirarles, que podrían estar en el país ilegalmente.”

 

Además de la alerta a viajeros, laACLU ha puesto a disposición del público materiales en inglés y español acercade los derechos individuales en caso de que las autoridades de Arizona y deotros estados los intercepten con motivo de la Ley SB 1070, o cualquier otromotivo. Los materiales incluyen una tarjeta que se puede descargar del internety que contiene instrucciones, aplicables en cualquier estado, acerca de cómoresponder si la policía, agentes de inmigración o agentes del FBI les piden quedetengan su vehículo y los interrogan, así como un documento con las preguntasmás frecuentes acerca de la Ley SB 1070.

 

“Nuestro objetivo es proteger a losresidentes del estado de Kentucky del acoso ilegal por parte de los cuerpospoliciacos y asegurarnos de que conozcan sus derechos en caso de toparse conéste,” afirma Aldrige. “Unaalta proporción de nuestros residentes tienen las características raciales quela policía sin duda para detener a viajeros en Arizona. Lamentablementevemos que en general los residents de Kentucky no están seguros de cuales son sus derechos en el momento que soninterrogados por los policías y comoparte de nuestro esfuerzo educacional agradecemos esta oportunidad para proveerinformación.

 

La ACLU y otras de lasorganizaciones de derechos civiles más destacadas entablaron una demandaimpugnando la ley de Arizona en mayo, pero mientras no se anule la ley, la ACLUadvierte que los individuos que viajen a Arizona deben estar conscientes de susderechos en caso de que los intercepten ahí.

 

Se pueden consultar materiales con informaciónacerca de los derechos individuales en caso de que los intercepten miembros delas fuerzas del orden público en: http://www.aclu.org

 

Para mayores informes acerca de laley de Arizona, incluyendo un video y audiovisual de la ACLU, vaya a: www.aclu.org/what-happens-arizona-stops-arizona

 

Si desea más información acerca dela demanda, incluyendo información acerca de los abogados y demandantes, vayaa: www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights-racial-justice/aclu-and-civil-rights-groups-file-legal-challenge-arizona-racial-pr
 
The Torch, 2010 Issues
Friday, June 11, 2010, 2:36 pm

The Torch, Winter 2010

 
The Torch, 2009 Issues
Friday, June 11, 2010, 2:31 pm

The Torch, Winter 2009

The Torch, Spring 2009

The Torch, Summer 2009

The Torch, Fall 2009

 

 
National Advances Reflected in Kentucky Legislature Unprecedented Fairness Progress in 2010 General
Thursday, April 29, 2010, 1:35 pm

 After recent legislative sessions targeting and attacking lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Kentuckians through anti-Fairness laws, the 2010 Kentucky legislature saw unprecedented progress for Fairness in the commonwealth.  

 

No Anti-Fairness Legislation Filed

 

For the first time in years, no legislator in the Kentucky Senate or House filed legislation targeting the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Kentuckians. Just last year, Shelbyville Senator Gary Tapp introduced Senate Bill 68, which would have barred any unmarried cohabitating couples from fostering or adopting children in the commonwealth. Fairness advocates rallied to quickly defeat that legislation with strong support from foster and adoption agencies, social workers, and faith-based groups across the state.

 

Last week similar legislation in Arkansas was struck down as unconstitutional. The Judge in the case reiterated the main point the Kentucky Statewide Fairness Coalition and its supporters made in the spring of 2009, that such legislation does not “serve the State’s interest in determining what is in the best interest of the child.”

 

Pro-Adoption Bill Heard in House

 

In response to last year’s failed anti-adoption measure, Rep. Tom Burch of Louisville this year introduced dual parent adoption House Bill 195, which would allow unmarried partners the legal ability to become parents of the children for whom they care.

 

Family court attorney and gay adoptive father Bryan Gatewood offered expert testimony to the House Health and Welfare Committee on the need for such a law in a March 11 hearing on the bill. He cited the loss of children’s rights to receive many of the benefits legally adopted children enjoy, such as the right to Social Security benefits upon the death of a parent, the right to be covered by both parents’ insurance, the right to receive child support and more. Toni Joyce, Executive Director of the National Association of Social Workers, reinforced Mr. Gatewood’s testimony with a personal plea for the children who this type of legal disenfranchisement affects, and both then fielded positive questions from legislators.

 

Mr. Gatewood and Ms. Joyce both requested Committee Chair Burch hold additional informational hearings during the interim committee meetings of the summer.

 

Record Number of Cosponsors on Statewide Fairness Bill

 

A record number of legislators signed on to Rep. Mary Lou Marzian’s statewide anti-discrimination Fairness House Bill 117, this year adding Rep. Arnold Simpson of Covington. Sen. Kathy Stein once more proposed a companion piece of legislation, Senate Bill 138.  

 

The law would amend the Kentucky Civil Rights Act to include sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classifications, prohibiting discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations in the commonwealth, a move unanimously endorsed by the Kentucky Commission on Human Rights in a 2008 Resolution sent to the Governor. It would make Kentucky the 21st state to extend such protections, and the first in the South. Currently only Covington, Lexington and Louisville have legal protections in Kentucky.

 

Hospital Visitation Rights Measure Passes House Unanimously

 

For the second year, Rep. Mary Lou Marzian’s hospital visitation rights House Bill 118, passed out of the Health and Welfare Committee with bi-partisan support. This session, the bill was approved unanimously on the House floor with a 99-0 vote.

 

The law would “allow a patient of a health facility who is 18 years of age or older to designate, in writing, an individual not legally related by marriage or blood, who the patient wishes to have visitation rights.” It is identical to the protections President Barack Obama called on the US Department of Health and Human Services to enact in an executive memorandum last Thursday, April 15.

 

Sponsors and cosponsors of 2010 Fairness legislation in Kentucky: Sen. Denise Harper Angel, Sen. Gerald Neal, Sen. Tim Shaughnessy, Sen. Kathy Stein, Rep. Tom Burch, Rep. Kelly Flood, Rep. Joni Jenkins, Rep. Mary Lou Marzian, Rep. Reggie Meeks, Rep. Darryl Owens, Rep. Ruth Ann Palumbo, Rep. Arnold Simpson, Rep. Jim Wayne and Rep. Susan Westrom.  

KY Statewide Fairness Coalition

ACLU of Kentucky, Fairness Campaign, Kentucky Commission on Human Rights

Kentucky Fairness Alliance, Lexington Fairness

 
2010 RFP Legislative Roundup
Wednesday, April 28, 2010, 9:29 am

The RFP is very pleased to be able to give you great news.


No new anti-choice restrictions passed in this year’s General Assembly!


Despite anti-choice legislators dirty tactics, we were able to defeat several pieces of legislation.
The first piece of legislation was Senate Bill 38.  SB 38 would have forced a woman to travel to an abortion clinic at least 24 hours prior to obtaining an abortion, which in effect would have doubled many women’s travel and child care costs.  The bill also would have forced a woman to listen to the results of an ultrasound even if she didn’t want to hear those results.  In trying to pass this legislation, anti-choice Representatives Floyd, Fischer, and Moore attached the bill as an amendment to several pieces of legislation.  By attaching these bills, these legislators killed bills that ranged from tracking child abuse deaths to helping at risk youth.  Thankfully pro-choice legislators were able to stop SB 38.


We owe a huge amount of gratitude to Representatives Burch, Marzian, Jenkins, Palumbo, Owens, Westrom, and Watkins for voting against SB 38 in the Health and Welfare Committee.  We also need to thank Senators, Stein, Harper-Angel, Shaughnessy, and Pendleton for being the only Senators to vote against SB 38. Please consider sending them a thank you note!

We also defeated two bills that sought to punish pregnant women addicted to drugs and alcohol.  According to House Bills 136 and 430, if a pregnant woman ingested drugs or alcohol prior to giving birth she would be charged with Wanton Child Endangerment.  Thankfully we were able to defeat this legislation.


Thank you for all the calls, emails, and letters you sent to legislators during this session.  We wouldn’t have been able to defeat this legislation without your help!

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 5 of 23