We are freedom’s watchdog, working in courts, legislatures and communities
to defend the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people by the
Constitution of the United States and the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
OOPS. Your Flash player is missing or outdated.Click here to update your player so you can see this content.
The 2010 General Assembly got under
way on January 5th and, by all accounts, we’re in for a very tough
session.Each year ACLU of
Kentucky staff and members travel to Frankfort to lobby the legislature on
important civil liberties issues.This work is made possible through the money raised from ACLU membership
dues.So if you’re not yet a member, or you need to renew, this is the perfect time of year to do so.
While
it’s early in the session, and many bills have not yet been filed, we do have
several priority issues that we are proactively working on.We continue to seek the
restoration of voting rights for former felons and statewide protections based
on sexual orientation and gender identity.We want to see comprehensive sexual education taught in our
schools and the death penalty abolished from our judicial system.And we will advocate for more inclusive
hospital visitation rights and a couple’s right to choose if, when, and how to
become parents.
The Reproductive Freedom Project is
advocating for comprehensive sexual education legislation, which will provide
Kentucky’s students with medically accurate and age appropriate healthcare
information, so they can make healthy decisions. We are encouraged this year by
the Federal government’s recent move away from funding abstinence-only programs
and towards teen pregnancy prevention programs.Additionally, Federal incentives and state legislation
passed in 2009 for education reform favor innovative programs – a real opportunity
for comprehensive sexual education to make headway in 2010.
Years
of work to abolish the death penalty in Kentucky have led us to a virtual
tipping point.This past fall the
ACLU of Kentucky brought the Journey of
Hope tour to seven college campuses across the state, addressing alternatives
to capital punishment from the perspectives of murder victim family members and
exonerated death row inmates.Just
this month the American Law Institute, which created the intellectual framework
for the death penalty adopted as part of the Model Penal Code, disavowed the
structure they’d created as irretrievably broken; a moral and practical
failure.Additionally, in the last
year Ohio switched to a single chemical for lethal injections and New Mexico
repealed its death penalty entirely.In light of the current climate, we feel that legislation introduced to
ban capital punishment for individuals with severe mental illness has a good
chance of passing the Kentucky General Assembly.
We
continue to push for statewide Fairness protections and legislation has already
been filed to amend Kentucky’s Civil Rights chapter to prohibit discrimination
based on sexual orientation or gender identity in housing, employment, and
public accommodations.We are also
promoting second-parent adoption legislation which would provide additional
security for children by redefining stepparent to include any non-relative
adult person who the court finds shares parental responsibility for the
child.Similarly, legislation has
been proposed that would allow patients over the age of 18 the ability to
designate an individual not legally related as an immediate family member.In effect, this legislation would
guarantee hospital visitation rights so that individuals can take care of their
loved ones in a time of need.
And
the campaign to restore the right to vote to former felons who have paid their
debt to society is gaining steam.Kentucky is one of only two states left in the country that continues to
disenfranchise people in this way and it’s time for a change.This legislation has gained additional
supporters every year and after Sen. Damon Thayer refused to give the bill a
hearing last year because he “hadn’t heard from his constituents” that the
issue was important to them, the ACLU of Kentucky and our allies spent a lot of
time in Thayer’s district over the past nine months.There were several editorials and letters to the editor that
appeared in the local paper and hundreds of Sen. Thayer’s constituents
contacted him because of these efforts.
Legislation
will undoubtedly be put forth that threatens civil liberties as well, and we
will be steadfast in our efforts to defeat such efforts at every turn.If you would like to lobby with us in
Frankfort between now and April, please contact the ACLU of Kentucky office at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
.And please consider joining or renewing your membership, or
making an additional donation during the General Assembly to support our
endeavors to shape public policy for all Kentuckians.
You
can track these issues and more during the 2010 General Assembly through ourLegislature Update page!Stay
informed by following the ACLU.
By Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, Reproductive Freedom Project
This morning, the Kentucky Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Cochran v. Commonwealth, a case that could have enormous consequences for healthy moms and babies in that state.
Ms. Cochran's road to Kentucky's Supreme Court has been a long one. Almost four years ago, Ms. Cochran gave birth to a baby girl. Her daughter allegedly tested positive for cocaine, and for that alone, Ms. Cochran was charged with felony child abuse. However, before her case could go to trial, the court dismissed the prosecution. The court was right: Ms. Cochran never should have been charged. In 1993, in Commonwealth v. Welch (the ACLU represented Ms. Welch in that case), the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that Kentucky's criminal laws could not be used to punish women who become and choose to remain pregnant despite a substance abuse problem.
You might think that the court's dismissal of her case would have been the end of Ms. Cochran's ordeal; unfortunately it was not. The state appealed, arguing that in later cases the Kentucky Supreme Court had actually reversed itself, even though it could point to no explicit language where the court had done so. Surprisingly, the appeals court agreed (though not one of the three judges on that court agreed for the same reason). With the law now totally in flux, the state Supreme Court accepted the case to settle the issue — again — of whether becoming and remaining pregnant is ever a crime in the state of Kentucky.
The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of Ms. Cochran, not only because we believe Welch is still good law, but, more fundamentally, because using criminal laws to punish pregnant women who are struggling with addiction makes for bad law and even worse public policy. If a pregnant woman can be charged with a crime for potentially harming her fetus, then literally everything she does or does not do — including choosing to continue her pregnancy to term despite an underlying health condition — could land her in jail. What if a pregnant woman has a glass of wine with dinner now and then, or lives with a smoker; what if she drives over the speed limit, fails to get regular pre-natal care, or works in a coal mine, as many women in Kentucky do?
Allowing the government to exercise such unlimited control over women's bodies, and every aspect of their lives, would essentially reduce pregnant women to second-class citizens, denying them the basic constitutional rights enjoyed by the rest of us.
Moreover, from a public health perspective, these prosecutions are simply counterproductive. Fifty-nine organizations and experts, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Kentucky Psychiatric Medical Association, joined friend-of-the-court briefs in this case, explaining that punitive approaches to improving fetal health just don't work. Seems obvious, right? By forcing doctors to turn in their own patients, these prosecutions only drive women away from the health care and treatment they need. If the state of Kentucky was truly interested in supporting healthy moms and babies, these groups point out, it would not be violating its own laws to throw the pregnant women who need health care the most in jail.
We are hopeful that the Kentucky Supreme Court will agree and uphold nearly two decades of sound law and policy in the state of Kentucky. Indeed, the court's decision will have ramifications beyond Ms. Cochran's case. At least two other women have been charged with similar "crimes" since Ms. Cochran's arrest. Our efforts should be focused on ensuring that pregnant women with underlying health conditions can get the care they need. Hopefully, this case will set us squarely on that path.
Well I had quite a day yesterday. I left my house at 4:30 for the first of two flight that would lead to Washington DC for the Stop Stupak rally and my meeting with Congressman Chandler’s staff. When I arrived at the Dirksen Senate Building it was teeming with activists from across the country. We all came with the single purpose of not allowing Congress to continue to use women’s bodies as their personal political playground.
The rally and day was incredibly powerful. To give you an idea of the energy and activism that went on consider, more than 1,000 supporters traveled to DC to lobby their members of Congress. They had to set up an overflow room for more than 200 people that couldn’t fit inside the Dirksen Auditorium for the rally. Over 100 lobby visits were scheduled. 30 states were represented. 17 campuses from 11 states were represented. Buses came from as far away as Maine and Wisconsin. 45 clergy from 13 states attended and 14 members of Congress came and spoke at the rally.
Needless to say it was an amazing experience. Unfortunately, my meeting with Chandler’s staff was not as energizing. I wanted to know (and continue to want to know) how a supposedly pro-choice member of Congress could vote for the Stupak amendment? It is Chandler’s understanding that Stupak merely keeps the status quo of the Hyde amendment. We know that isn’t the case. Stupak goes far beyond the status quo. For more information about that meeting click here .
I spent the rest of they day talking to activists from across the country. Thankfully many of them had more success than I had. After that, I caught two very delayed flights I came home to an inbox full of encouragement and support. Needless to say it was quite a day, but our fight isn’t over.
Please send a letter to your Congressmember and tell them to Stop Stupak .
Lastly, make sure Congressman Chandler knows Kentucky wants to Stop Stupak. Call his Lexington office (859) 219-1366 and tell them simply, “You cannot be pro-choice and support the Stupak-Pitts amendment”. And. “Stupak is not the status quo”!